Friday, April 25, 2008
Wednesday, April 9, 2008
on the opposite page to mcyan timesq incident in Apple Daily, is a smaller entry on AIR 4x4 project working their way into the community.
Recently heard, there is a work of Bansky to be on show here in town. Name of Bansky seems to be spreading quick, while many still have not heard of him when Law Man Lok introduced about him in the Comics hijacking Activism workshop. But I did notice a short news article in am 730 of a wall with his graffiti getting auctioned.
Tiny West mentioned also in the workshop of a few props that they saw from manual books for protestors and tried to reproduce themselves. Those designs suddenly remind me of the works of another artist that I came upon in Istanbul Biennial 07. check out the gears he designed at www.tersyontersyon.blogspot.com
也是一個奧運吹水會?
Tuesday, April 8, 2008
Monday, April 7, 2008
Wednesday, April 2, 2008
周末活動 / WEEKEND EVENTS
2008/05/04 [星期六/SAT] 1400 - 1900
[Exhibition Gallery]
[Exhibition Gallery]
1400
「Para/Site藝術空間 - 香港賽馬會策展工作計劃」簡介
Introducing Para/Site Art Space - Hong Kong Jockey Club Curatorial Training Programme
[英語進行/conducted in English][Symposium Room]
1430
《人在皇后》放映
Screening of QUEEN’S PIER
映後討論會 / Discussion session
[粵語進行/conducted in Cantonese]
1700
Screening of QUEEN’S PIER
映後討論會 / Discussion session
[粵語進行/conducted in Cantonese]
1700
獨立媒體 宣傳片 導演版(鬼影版) 首播
In-media PROMO director's cut (ghostly version) Preview
[Exhibition Gallery]
「斷估唔拉之騎劫時代廣場」比賽頒獎典禮移師周日時代廣場通告
Announcement over Hijacking Times Square Competition Prizes Giving Ceremony moving on to Sunday at Times Square
[粵語進行/conducted in Cantonese]
1730
Announcement over Hijacking Times Square Competition Prizes Giving Ceremony moving on to Sunday at Times Square
[粵語進行/conducted in Cantonese]
1730
郭達年 與 歐寧 對談
Dialogue between LENNY KWOK (Guo Da-nian) and OU NING
(梁文道主持/Host by LEUNG MAN TAO)
[粵語進行/conducted in Cantonese]
2008/06/04 [星期日/SUN] 1500
1500
「斷估唔拉之騎劫時代廣場」比賽頒獎典禮
Hijacking Time Square Competition Prizes Giving Ceremony
地點:銅鑼灣時代廣場
venue: Time Square, Causeway Bay
資料簡介
《人在皇后》
拍攝:自治八樓+影行者/剪接:林森/地區:香港/年份:2007/08/ 語言:廣東話/片長﹕約90分鐘
Queen's Pier
Filming: autonomus 8a, v-artivist/Editing: Lam Sam/Region: Hong Kong/Year: 2007/08/Language: Cantonese/Length: approx. 90 mins
在主流媒體的洗刷後,保衛皇后碼頭運動裡的人,很多時給人的印象頂多只是一班激進的示威者。但其實在整個運動之中,存在著很多不同背景的人,他們每一個都有不同的信念,身處在共同的一個社會運動之中,每日經歷著喜、怒、哀、樂,能夠維繫在一起的,就只是相信自已的參與,能夠改變一些被認為不能改變的東西。清場過後,皇后碼頭被圍板重重圍困。輸了嗎?沒有。因為仍然有人嘗試,繼續與運動去發生關係,想去改變那些「不可能」。
郭達年
前黑鳥樂團的靈魂人物。黑鳥是香港獨一無二的無政府主義樂團,自七○年代成軍以來,持續地以非暴力的音樂形式等展開全面性的文化革命。黑鳥堅持拒絕向政府申請補助,經營樂團所需要的所有資源,全依靠團員勞動所得。…兩千年到來前,黑鳥以《黑夜驪歌》作為告別作。…二○○七年,郭達年把黑鳥樂隊二十年來的創作結集成七碟裝的《黑鳥全集》Bag Set,隨後把九十年初的《黑鳥通訊》部份文獻結集,出版了《在黑夜的死寂中歌唱》一書,包含對話、採訪、作品、記錄以文字、圖案、照片、手譜,是一個超過二十多年的文化實踐的紀實「文件」。(摘自http://www.mackiestudy.com/worsttime/lenny.htm)
歐寧
一九六九年生於廣東。一九九三年畢業於深圳大學國際文化傳播系。中學時代已創辦詩歌刊物。一九九四年創辦音樂團體「新群眾」。一九九六年創辦設計公司「音速中國」。一九九八年創辦「新茗堂」藝術書店。一九九九年在深圳、廣州兩地創辦電影團體「緣影會」。二OO三年,影片《三元里》參加威尼斯雙年展。二OO四年創辦藝術空間「別館」。現生活工作於廣州和北京,從事創作、策劃、講課、設計及出版等工作。
Dialogue between LENNY KWOK (Guo Da-nian) and OU NING
(梁文道主持/Host by LEUNG MAN TAO)
[粵語進行/conducted in Cantonese]
2008/06/04 [星期日/SUN] 1500
1500
「斷估唔拉之騎劫時代廣場」比賽頒獎典禮
Hijacking Time Square Competition Prizes Giving Ceremony
地點:銅鑼灣時代廣場
venue: Time Square, Causeway Bay
資料簡介
《人在皇后》
拍攝:自治八樓+影行者/剪接:林森/地區:香港/年份:2007/08/ 語言:廣東話/片長﹕約90分鐘
Queen's Pier
Filming: autonomus 8a, v-artivist/Editing: Lam Sam/Region: Hong Kong/Year: 2007/08/Language: Cantonese/Length: approx. 90 mins
在主流媒體的洗刷後,保衛皇后碼頭運動裡的人,很多時給人的印象頂多只是一班激進的示威者。但其實在整個運動之中,存在著很多不同背景的人,他們每一個都有不同的信念,身處在共同的一個社會運動之中,每日經歷著喜、怒、哀、樂,能夠維繫在一起的,就只是相信自已的參與,能夠改變一些被認為不能改變的東西。清場過後,皇后碼頭被圍板重重圍困。輸了嗎?沒有。因為仍然有人嘗試,繼續與運動去發生關係,想去改變那些「不可能」。
郭達年
前黑鳥樂團的靈魂人物。黑鳥是香港獨一無二的無政府主義樂團,自七○年代成軍以來,持續地以非暴力的音樂形式等展開全面性的文化革命。黑鳥堅持拒絕向政府申請補助,經營樂團所需要的所有資源,全依靠團員勞動所得。…兩千年到來前,黑鳥以《黑夜驪歌》作為告別作。…二○○七年,郭達年把黑鳥樂隊二十年來的創作結集成七碟裝的《黑鳥全集》Bag Set,隨後把九十年初的《黑鳥通訊》部份文獻結集,出版了《在黑夜的死寂中歌唱》一書,包含對話、採訪、作品、記錄以文字、圖案、照片、手譜,是一個超過二十多年的文化實踐的紀實「文件」。(摘自http://www.mackiestudy.com/worsttime/lenny.htm)
歐寧
一九六九年生於廣東。一九九三年畢業於深圳大學國際文化傳播系。中學時代已創辦詩歌刊物。一九九四年創辦音樂團體「新群眾」。一九九六年創辦設計公司「音速中國」。一九九八年創辦「新茗堂」藝術書店。一九九九年在深圳、廣州兩地創辦電影團體「緣影會」。二OO三年,影片《三元里》參加威尼斯雙年展。二OO四年創辦藝術空間「別館」。現生活工作於廣州和北京,從事創作、策劃、講課、設計及出版等工作。
Wednesday, March 26, 2008
事務多多,搭多了地鐵,有一天遇上metropop發行天,拿了一本來研究,竟發現有chie!的介紹而給打了一頓,也就收起來給相關人們過目,沒有想到,今天再翻下去,竟發現一則新聞,話說bjork在上海演唱,encore的部分,高歌了一曲declare independence,並把Tibet也混入其中地名.
我看不明白篇文的立場,大概是想把內地網民的反應和bjork也各打五十大板?以下這種的想法,真是不敢恭維,跟當天覓現香港的討論不相伯仲:
不管怎樣,買票為著看戲聽曲,不是為了你的個人言論自由.若要,籌集資金支持自己的言論,就別用錯圈錢的方式,利用他人對政治以外的興趣,比如音樂,比如裝酷.
或者,竟然他們都自認聽bjork音樂可比如裝酷,那不過就是裝的而已?
我看不明白篇文的立場,大概是想把內地網民的反應和bjork也各打五十大板?以下這種的想法,真是不敢恭維,跟當天覓現香港的討論不相伯仲:
不管怎樣,買票為著看戲聽曲,不是為了你的個人言論自由.若要,籌集資金支持自己的言論,就別用錯圈錢的方式,利用他人對政治以外的興趣,比如音樂,比如裝酷.
或者,竟然他們都自認聽bjork音樂可比如裝酷,那不過就是裝的而已?
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
Well, talked with Tobias again today over the trouble with Osage concerning the foyer projection and my earlier entry here. It turned out to be another unfortunate mis-communication between different parties, and I am therefore happy to apologize for any false accusation to anyone based on incomplete facts. (the peculiar fact is ofcourse, how come I also have only the partial facts?)
The fact, it seems, is that Osage did ask or communicate (unfortunately just) with Tobias (and not us curators of the show), about what they wanted to do with the foyer projection, while we curators were then still attempting to use the foyer projection for showing our participants' work there. For us, work of art always should have the priorty, and hence we were particularly dissatisfied then, with the intended work showing there being replaced by a design that has not our (curators') endorsement.
I certainly do not want to put all the blame on to Tobias, for our idea over the projection at the foyer was a rather late decision, and I principally agreed with Tobias then, that it would be a waste of our energy with what I proposed to do, that of asking both Norman and us to meet with Osage and decide together on what to do with the front projection.
Yet taking in Tobias' advise on the spot, I shifted to response to it in the CHiE blog afterwards, by trying to see or link this experience with the topic of creative commons vs copy, stirring up attention to a new kind of unclear border, a grey zone, which is also a part of what the show is trying to address. What is stealing if we are trying to opening up copyright? What is it (or Why is it) that our designer was feeling bad about this? (Because its immitator technique is inferior?) I believe all these, should be a much more positive lesson for us to think about.
here is a link to OPEN KNOWLEDGE.
The fact, it seems, is that Osage did ask or communicate (unfortunately just) with Tobias (and not us curators of the show), about what they wanted to do with the foyer projection, while we curators were then still attempting to use the foyer projection for showing our participants' work there. For us, work of art always should have the priorty, and hence we were particularly dissatisfied then, with the intended work showing there being replaced by a design that has not our (curators') endorsement.
I certainly do not want to put all the blame on to Tobias, for our idea over the projection at the foyer was a rather late decision, and I principally agreed with Tobias then, that it would be a waste of our energy with what I proposed to do, that of asking both Norman and us to meet with Osage and decide together on what to do with the front projection.
Yet taking in Tobias' advise on the spot, I shifted to response to it in the CHiE blog afterwards, by trying to see or link this experience with the topic of creative commons vs copy, stirring up attention to a new kind of unclear border, a grey zone, which is also a part of what the show is trying to address. What is stealing if we are trying to opening up copyright? What is it (or Why is it) that our designer was feeling bad about this? (Because its immitator technique is inferior?) I believe all these, should be a much more positive lesson for us to think about.
here is a link to OPEN KNOWLEDGE.
Saturday, March 22, 2008

區區有睇頭 文化導賞團
透過文化導賞團,你重新以另一個角度去看看香港這個既熟識又陌生的地方。我們深信每一個社區都是一個寶藏,等待著我們去發掘埋藏在它裡面的歷史、文化、人和人之間的…… 究竟區內的發展,在過去、現在、將來,如何改變了那個地方,還有使用那地方的人?
內容
社區導賞2-3 hrs +行後分享 30 mins
觀塘 周思中+袁人 「工廠的興衰與轉變」
4月之旅 「 盡 管你我空間 」系列
九龍灣 謝柏齊 「大商廈的空間設計」
深水土步 薯寶 「小商舖的生活智慧」
費用 每人每次收費:$40
1. 系列參與形式收費:一次繳交3次團費,而全部出席者,可獲退回$40大元。
2. 如4人或以上結伴報名,可以以優惠價$120參加一團。
後續活動:錄像工作坊
後續活動:錄像工作坊
名額:每團15人 報名及查詢:Phoebe 6596 0906 / p_h_o_e_b_e2000@yahoo.com.hk
主辦: 自治八樓(學聯社會運動資源中心) 23977231
截止報名日期:2月24日
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


